Valor products are the world’s leading software for printed circuit board (PCB) design for manufacturing (DFM) and manufacturing execution (MES) systems. Valor’s solutions target three key segments in the PCB manufacturing market: design of the physical layout of the PCB, fabrication of the bare PCB, and assembly of PCB components. With the acquisition of Valor, Mentor is now positioned as the only EDA supplier to provide the electronics industry with a PCB systems solution from concept through manufacturing.

“Valor’s expertise and products in the manufacturing segment are an excellent fit to Mentor’s in the PCB design area as together we provide a concept-through-manufacturing design solution to our customers,” stated Henry Potts, vice president and general manager of the Systems Design Division of Mentor Graphics. “This acquisition will reinforce our number one position in PCB design while enabling Valor to leverage the strengths of Mentor and accelerate their delivery of differentiated design for manufacturing and manufacturing execution products.”

By acquiring Valor, Mentor is the first major EDA vendor to extend its scope into the market for PCB systems manufacturing solutions. This will benefit the electronics industry by enabling electronics companies to finally eliminate the long-standing technical barriers and inefficiencies between the worlds of design and manufacturing. Mentor will be in a unique position to deliver an efficient, bi-directional engineering process between designers, their partners in systems manufacturing, and the product supply chain.
“This is a very exciting opportunity for all of us,” said Dan Hoz, former Valor CEO and now general manager of the newly-formed Valor division of Mentor Graphics. “With both companies occupying leading positions in their respective markets, our combined expertise can deliver a breakthrough in operational integration between the world of design and the supply-chain oriented world of manufacturing, for the benefit of the entire electronics industry. We foresee a promising future for Valor as a division of Mentor Graphics.”

The development of solutions for the manufacturing market will remain a core activity of the Valor division, reinforcing Valor’s and Mentor’s long-term commitment to deliver solutions and support to the manufacturing market, as well as powerful integration of design for manufacturing functionality into Mentor and non-Mentor PCB design environments. For more information regarding the acquisition and the go-forward strategy, visit www.mentor.com/valor.

About Mentor Graphics

Mentor Graphics Corporation (NASDAQ: MENT) is a world leader in electronic hardware and software design solutions, providing products, consulting services and award-winning support for the world’s most successful electronics and semiconductor companies. Established in 1981, the company reported revenues over the last 12 months of about $800 million and employs approximately 4,425 people worldwide. Corporate headquarters are located at 8005 S.W. Boeckman Road, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070-7777. World Wide Web site: http://www.mentor.com/.

(Mentor Graphics is a registered trademark of Mentor Graphics Corporation. All other company or product names are the registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.)

Here we go…

Industry Staples
Electrical/Electronics and Computer Development Engineers Group (2,789  April ’09- 5,796 Members Now)
This is the largest technical group I was a part of last  year.  It is a dynamic group, and very active.  However, the content tends to be a little bit more generic, and lacks the technical specificity found within the smaller groups formed for topical discussions.  That being said, I really appreciate that there is always something new whenever you visit, and there is a large, diverse audience to whom you can field discussion questions, share news articles, and work on your networking skills.

EMS Insider (Electronics Manufacturing Services (2,663 April ’09- 5,815 Members Now)
EMS Insider falls into the same category of LinkedIn group as the EECDE group above.  More general discussion on larger, less specific, and often marketing/manufacturing oriented topics.  This is a great group to be a part of so that you have messaging rights to people within the industry.

PCB Forum (1,133 Members Now)
The PCB Forum group is a mid sized group and falls right in the middle of everything.  Decent membership, good conversation, relevant news, etc.  If you’re not a part of this group, you ought to be.

Printed  Circuit Board Technologies and Solutions (330 Members April ’09- 930 Members Now)
Same thoughts as the PCB Forum above.

PCB Designers and PCB Designers Group (423 Members and 378 Members respectively)
These two groups cater to the PCB Designer, as is clear by their titles.  PCB Designers is the more robust and put together group, although PCB Designers Group still has provided some valuable activity for me in the news section whenever I have posted a link.  There is a discussion thread about combining the two groups… and whether that happened or not, I am not sure.  I would speculate that a majority of the members are overlapping members.  However, these are my two favorite groups!!…. be sure to check them out and join.  I see them growing tremendously in the next year.

VLSI (2,337 Members April ’09- 4,233 Now)
This group has grown a lot, but still has that feel of being subsidized by a few key contributors rather than it being a lively, dynamic community.

IPC – Association Connecting Electronics Industries
The IPC group is a great resource for the PCB Professional.  Although it is not updated or contributed to as often as many other groups, it is relatively free of junk postings and distractions.  I really appreciate the IPC and their efforts to provide resources; and supporting their LinkedIn group is a great way to show some support.

Rising Stars
These groups have great potential and I see them growing tremendously in the near future… however, that’s up to all of you.  With a little love and involvement, I see these topic/technology specific groups growing into very informative communities.  Some have very few members, and great content, while others have a good number of members, but need more applicable content.

Flex Circuit (42 Members April ’09- 172 Members Now)

PCB/BGA Rework and Repair (103 Members Now)

Unexplainable PCB Quality Issues (151 Members Now)

PCB HDI – Next Generation (124 Members Now)

Signal Integrity Engineering (1,184 Members Now)

RF/Analog/Mixed signal circuit design & product/test engineering (883 Members Now)

RFID/AIDC Technology (1,818 Members Now)

Homepage logo taken from this site.

I see a variety of similarities between Tin whiskers… and my own: Elusive, thin, short, and never helpful.  And there is always the random single hair that frustrates you to no end.

Unfortunately, the costs associated with tin whiskers in the electronics, defense, health, and aerospace industries are astronomical compared to my need to shave once every two weeks.  Failure of products due to tin whisker growth can undermine an entire mission, scrap a program, or take a life.  I think about electronic pacemakers, our men and women traveling to space, or our servicemen and women flying at Mach speeds thousands of feet above the ground.

There has yet to be a definitive ruling made concerning the cause/prevention of whiskers, although pure tin components and plating seem to exhibit the highest likelihood of developing them.  Best practices at this time are to use a tin/lead mix with no greater than 97% tin.  However, RoHS regulations are throwing a wrench into this with its demands for lead-free products.  Some RoHS frequently asked questions are answered here.

This issue received significant attention at the IPC Technology Interchange this last December.  Also, the Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering at the University of Maryland (CALCE) and The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research at Osaka University (ISIR) are putting on another International Symposium on Tin Whiskers this June.  The call for papers is still out.  Read more about this at PCB007. Proceedings from past Symposiums can be found here.

For a great overview of tin whiskers, be sure to check out the resources provided by NASA.  The pictures in this article have all been sourced from NASA.

Have you dealt with tin whiskers in your products/designs? What types of damage have they caused?  What are some of the things you have done to diminish the likelihood of them?

Homepage Image Original found here

I have spent some time exploring the virtual show floor and various exhibits.  My gut response? I miss shaking hands.

A virtual trade show has some great benefits.  The reduced costs associated with travel is the first to come to mind.  There is also the advantage of being able to go about your day at work, and to hear a notification that someone has stepped into your “booth”.

However, my first interaction with a virtual show hasn’t been the best.  Please do not read that as a condemnation of virtual shows.  I just don’t fit the description of someone who would truly benefit from this show.  It seems that this style of show (virtual) really weeds out the moochers.  What I mean is – there are a few very specific strengths of the show, and if you fit within the target of those strengths, it will be great.  However, if you’re on the fence, you won’t like it.

With 2,300 attendees, Virtual PCB has been great for the exhibitors.  Many have stated that their booths have been consistently busy.  And it would be awesome to be an attendee looking for some services provided by the exhibitors.  The ability to switch in between various companies and instantly chat with them is great.  Exhibitors also have access to attendee lists, which is a very valuable resource when used correctly.

But for me, as a competitor to most of the exhibitors and being a marketing guy without technical expertise, there was not a whole lot of benefit.  Had we exhibited, I might be singing a different song.  This is a great benefit for the exhibitors… having a firewall/deterrant of sorts to their competitors.  There is very little cherry-picking.

What are your thoughts or experiences concerning virtual shows?  They are definitely a piece of the puzzle as it relates to the future of our industry.  UP Media is leading the charge, and sincerely I commend them.  Did you find the show helpful?  Are there aspects you wish were different?

I have spoken with several individuals in the last few weeks who hold high expectations, and look to DesignCon as being the most valuable show of the year.  Although that is personal opinion, I can easily see why those sentiments have been shared.

If you’re in the area, be sure to register and attend the show.  You can buy your various passes here.

Also, be sure to follow @DesignCon2010 on twitter.

The year 2009 has been an intense crash-course and immersion into the PCB industry.  I entered the field having only seen a board in settings such as when my mother’s blender lay torn apart on my lap as I sought to “fix” it as a ten-year-old.  My background is in entrepreneurship and business development.  Keep these things in mind as you read, but I hope that you do not allow them to lessen the various observations.  Please be sure to comment, critique, and add to this article in the comments section.

Market Segments
Tradeshows
There is nothing as bittersweet as a tradeshow.  It is easy to see that while many I’ve spoken with claim to dread the show circuit, there is an industry sustaining vibrancy found on the tradeshow floor.  In fact, regardless of size, shows remind many that they are not alone in this economic climate and in this industry.  “How about them Yankees” was definitely replaced by depressed and rehearsed comments about overseas production and its implications.  Yet even competitors can console one another.

Recessions inherently bring about budget cuts and a careful critique of the ROI (return on investment) of all marketing endeavors including tradeshows.  Smaller displays with fewer freebies seemed more prominent as the year progressed.

However, tradeshows will never go away because there is an inherent need within any industry to foster community and to provide convenient platforms for vendors and customers to interact.  Yet there is a great need for training and planning of employees to occur in 2010.  Pre and post-event networking skills need to be developed.  And it seems clear that the question of whether we will attend the next tradeshow is moot until we have exhausted an investigation of how we can best take advantage of the opportunity contained within each show.

Media and Trade Publications
As a complete rookie to PCB’s, I found the press to be my greatest ally.  Wonderful individuals within UP Media and  iConnect007 greatly encouraged and guided me through year one.  In fact, they are both the customer and supplier’s greatest asset.  Many of the most knowledgeable individuals are connected with these organizations and an email to either requesting direction or a good contact will usually turn out well.  Don’t expect them to play favorites or violate privacy issues, but they will do their best to direct you toward professionals or resources which will aid you greatly.

Political Climate
Changing the political landscape concerning any issue is always a laborious and time consuming process.  However, great strides were taken this year as the position of PCB Executive Agent was created.  In the second week of December, close to one hundred twenty-five industry professionals gathered in Washington D.C. to discuss how we can meet the needs of the Department of Defense in the future.  It was great to see so many key organizations represented and to see that many CEO’s and owners attended personally.  If there is to be a single word that must define 2010, it will be collaboration.  The IPC Technology Interchange in Washington was a great step toward that end.  I will discuss collaboration in greater depth shortly.

Customers
Throughout the year I sensed a continual increase in both the loyalty and price consciousness of our customers.  It was great to see the loyalty exhibited by many of our best customers, while it was tough to see quotes lost on price: even a few dollars.  Budget cuts have made it hard for everyone, and it is understandable in most cases why these occurred.

Although the following recommendation is applicable to every year within a business, I feel 2010 demands an even greater attempt.  It is clear that better communication and collaboration could and should occur between customers and the design, fabrication and assembly providers.  My hope is to personally continue to search out ways we can better serve our customers  (based on what they say, not what we assume).  This is crucial; especially for the small domestic board shops and assemblers.

Praises and Hopes
I have seen several people step up and push the envelope this year.  Some have exhibited customer service above and beyond expectations, some have embarked on innovative marketing and sales endeavors, and several faces have gained recognition as they position themselves as experts within their niche.  Below are some of the ways that they have accomplished these things.

Online Resources
Those who have met me this year most likely know about my passion for seeing the industry catch up with the rest of the private sector in regards to leveraging the tools and resources available online.  There is much to be done, but I am pleased with the small steps taken this year.  The year 2009 exhibited an increased number of companies transitioning to online marketing and advertising.  Several new columnists have appeared for various media organizations and the concept of blogging is beginning to make sense to some.

I continually experience excitement over our endeavors to develop an industry blog, yet see little follow through.  Although much of that may be due to the quality of my efforts, I do hope to see increased support and contribution in the coming year for HotPCB and my colleagues who are pouring their energies into online media.

I was given the opportunity to speak at UP Media’s PCB Atlanta in October on the subject of how the PCB industry can effectively leverage the various Web 2.0 tools currently available.  Those in attendance seemed to find it helpful, and it was a great first step.  I challenge both individuals and organizations to sit down and evaluate how they can implement these tools into their various marketing and sales strategies.

Federal Programs
This year’s Federal Matchmaking event in Tarrytown, NY was extremely well attended.  I highly admire the SBLO’s and various individuals who spend their time making sure that small-business allocated opportunities are distributed.

The PTAC officers and employees really stepped up and it was very apparent how much they desire to foster commerce between small/disadvantaged businesses and the government.

Education
There is a huge need for education within the industry.  And yet, providing resources to seasoned veteran is far from enough.  Unfortunately, the industry is graying, and there is no clear next generation.  Some have recognized the massive vacuum that is forming and are investigating the feasibility of teaching electronics at the high-school level.  This is a movement still in its infancy and needs a lot of support, guidance, materials, and commitment.  That is where collaboration will truly show its worth.

Collaboration
As promised, I want to briefly touch on collaboration once again.  It has been said that when everyone is responsible, no one is responsible.  I saw a lot of great concepts discussed at the Technology Interchange.  There has been a lot of hard work on the part of various individuals.  We as an industry need to be very careful that we don’t simply sit back and applaud their work.  A concerted effort should be made by all.

Change is a slow process.  But it is even slower when there are only a few players.  My hope is that 2010 will be a year marked with collaboration, unity, and change.  We have all seen glimpses of where things could go.  And although it is unlikely that things will ever look like they did twenty years ago, I find it highly likely that this industry will take huge leaps forward in the next twelve months.

In ending, I am very thankful for where I am, and where we are.  Great hopes drive my endeavors and will continue to shape my efforts.  Where do you see yourself making a difference?  What unique skills can you bring to the table?  How can we come together to overcome the various challenges that are facing our industry?

2010, here we come.

U.S. Consulates Help IPC APEX EXPO Exhibitors Reach Across Oceans and Borders to Develop Business and Partnerships

BANNOCKBURN, Ill., USA, December 18, 2009 — The U.S. Department of Commerce has chosen IPC APEX EXPO^TM as one of a select group of U.S. trade shows to participate in its International Buyer Program (IBP) for 2010. The event, produced by IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries®, was chosen by a vote of U.S. embassies, consulates and commercial centers worldwide. One measure was the show’s appeal to overseas visitors. In 2009, 15 percent of attendees came from 42 countries other than the United States.

“We’re pleased to be able to provide this exclusive opportunity to our exhibitors to help them expand their businesses globally,” says Kim Sterling, IPC vice president of marketing & communications. As one of only 36 U.S. trade shows in the IBP, IPC APEX EXPO has secured support from Commercial Service officers around the world who will reach out to their local regions to recruit qualified buyers, sales representatives and business partners to the event.

Country and industry experts from the U.S. Commercial Service will be on-site during IPC APEX EXPO to help companies with hands-on export counseling, marketing analysis and matchmaking services. In addition to the increased global promotion of the event, a special Export Interest Guide will be provided to all international attendees to give them an easy way to identify IPC APEX EXPO exhibitors who are interested in exporting to specific international markets.

Only IPC APEX EXPO 2010 exhibitors may participate in the IBP as suppliers. Information is available at www.IPCAPEXEXPO.org/IBP for current exhibitors. Companies that are interested in exhibiting should contact IPC Director of Trade Show Sales Mary Mac Kinnon at +1 847-597-2886 or MaryMacKinnon@ipc.org.

For more information on IPC APEX EXPO, visit www.IPCAPEXEXPO.org. Individuals who are interested in visiting the show as part of an international delegation should contact their local U.S. commercial specialist, embassy or consulate. Links to local consulates as well as information on obtaining visas, translated in eight languages, is available at www.IPCAPEXEXPO.org/international.

# # #

About IPC

IPC (www.IPC.org) is a global trade association based in Bannockburn, Ill., dedicated to the competitive excellence and financial success of its 2,700 member companies which represent all facets of the electronics industry, including design, printed board manufacturing, electronics assembly and test. As a member-driven organization and leading source for industry standards, training, market research and public policy advocacy, IPC supports programs to meet the needs of an estimated $1.7 trillion global electronics industry. IPC maintains additional offices in Taos, N.M.; Arlington, Va.; Garden Grove, Calif.; Stockholm, Sweden; Moscow, Russia; and Shanghai and Shenzhen, China.

Contact:

Anna Garrido, IPC Director of Marketing and Communications
+1 847-597-2804
AnnaGarrido@ipc.org

Education?
The first question that you might ask yourself is whether this is something for which you can go to school.  I approached Bill Brooks of Datron World Communications, who in the past has taught classes at Palomar College in PCB Design and Advanced PCB Design.  He was introduced into the field because his father owned a board shop where he worked until he was nineteen.  Bill echoed what I have heard from many:  that traditionally designers do not have college degrees.  A four-year degree, let alone a Masters, is not needed to be successful.  However, the technology continues to advance and designers must be much more rounded and have a greater understanding of a wide variety of variables than they did even only ten years ago.  I also spoke with Rick Hartley of L-3 Communications.  He is an accomplished designer and teaches technical seminars at various trade shows around the country.  He echoed the same sentiment.

Although various classes are available, the most valuable training is found within a mentorship relationship.  Rick learned how to design because a co-worker and mentor took the time to teach him.  Do you wonder where you can find a mentor, or the academic resources to succeed?  Fortunately there are a variety of places for you to go where you can receive training and meet designers who would love to teach you, especially if you are a younger entrant into the field.

If you are truly interested in making it in the field of PCB design, you must immerse yourself and strive to become an expert.  Let’s break it down into three approaches.  You need to network with current designers and find a mentor(s), you need to attend technical workshops and training sessions, and there are a few must have books that you ought to read.  Let’s start with networking.

Networking
The IPC is a very well recognized organization worldwide and they host online communities called Designer Councils which are divided up geographically.  Some of the most active councils are in Orange County and Portland.  You have a great opportunity to connect with and meet in person designers who would love to help you learn.  Although slightly archaic in their technology (they use list server technology), this is a very valuable tool and will allow you to connect with thousands of professionals.  the IPC recognizes the need to cultivate new designers and is actively pursuing programs to do just that.  Also, check out the article Best and Worst LinkedIn Groups for PCB Enthusiasts.  Use the connections within those groups, the discussion boards, the Q&A section, etc to meet and interact with experts.

Technical Training
Board design has gotten more complex as the devices they power have pushed the limits.  Although the printed circuit board has not changed significantly in its build over the last 35 years, the environment into which it is placed has.  Designers must understand electronic theory at a technician level, understand the PCB fabrication process, mechanical stress and how to prevent failure modes, the assembly process, testing processes, what the board is going to end up in for additional variables, and must also be cost conscious when it comes to materials.  Does this sound overwhelming?  Fortunately there is a plethora of design shows where you can attend technical sessions pertaining to all of these issues.  There are the IPC and Design Conferences, UP Media group’s PCB shows, designer council meetings, webinars, blogs, and companies that offer training courses.  Follow the various links and explore the opportunities to receive training.  The best training Rick ever recieved was a week long session about “board design for productibility.”  Seek out similar courses and seminars, and  you will do great.

Read, Read, Read!
If you want to be the best, you need to read from the best.  I have taken suggestions from several experts regarding what books they feel are the best for you to read if you’re seeking to expand your knowledge of the field.  I have listed them in the bookstore section of HotPCB.  Do us a favor, if you purchase through our links we might make a dollar.  That’d be cool.

I ended  all of my interviews asking if they had any predictions of where the industry was going, or what they would say in closing to someone just getting started.  Rick made the point that there are going to be a lot of available jobs and to get into it now.  In the long run it will pay off.  He took a pay cut when he first went into design, but quickly surpassed his former income.  Many designers are going to be retiring in the next 10 years, but PCB’s aren’t going anywhere.

The more authors we have, the more dynamic and informative the site will be.  I hope that over time we will have about 15 independent contributors who are able to provide a short 250-500 word article once every couple weeks.

If you are interested in taking on this small, but essential role within the development of HotPCB.com, please feel free to get in touch with us. We can talk about the various potential topics. This site is still very dynamic and your contributions and ideas will help it develop into a great resource.

Call Liam Morris at (800) 217-0202 x13 or email at lmorris@hotpcb.com

In addition to a large number of PCB enterprises in Taiwan, many PCB operations are located in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Guangdong provinces.

Among them are leading PCB makers earning hundreds of millions of dollars in annual revenues and employing thousands of workers.

They also spend huge sums on environmental protection, including the disposal of manufacturing wastes from production processes and everyday operations.

The major pollution source of PCB industries is the copper content in the spent etchant and wastewater streams.

Traditionally, liquid resin is used to chelate spent etchant, forming copper ions and converting them into a copper sulfate solution for industrial applications.

Although this process can recover most of the copper from PCB waste streams, a considerable amount of the metal is unrecoverable. This metal is discharged into the environment, which can cause severe water pollution problems.

For any major plant, the daily amount of wastewater, along with untreated sludge, can total thousands of tons. This wastewater and sludge contains copper and also lead, tin and other metals used in soldering processes.

Stricter environmental protections adopted in recent years have forced PCB manufacturers to seek new technologies to promote better, yet cost-efficient waste recycling methods.Shortly after the State Council announced its 4 trillion yuan stimulus package to boost the domestic economy, attention turned to reviving industrial sectors battered by the ongoing global economic crisis.

During a series of meetings by the State Council in January and February this year, an “industrial restructuring” policy was adopted that focused on “10 key sectors.” The PCB industry is among those key sectors.

The government asked that PCB manufacturers focus on two elements: cleaner production (CP) and a circular economy (CE) to make this industry environmentally clear and economically stronger.

A semi-annual PCB technical conference in May at Suzhou, Jiangsu province, answered this CP/CE challenge with green technology sessions and economic discussions.

Hundreds of Chinese companies were represented – all eager to learn innovative technologies and international market trends.

Papers were presented on energy-saving measures, emissions reductions and also proposed CP/CE practices.

Seven universities in Taiwan established an incubator to study “best practice” CP/CE applications at the Center for Innovation and Incubation at Chung Yuan University.

The center has invited the participation of industry representatives, academic institutions and the government.

A persistent challenge is the incomplete recovery of copper from plant discharges, wastewater and sludge.

A recovery procedure recently developed by Taiwan-based Trinity Resource Technology Inc has employed a CP/CE solution.

The procedure involves separating copper compounds from wastewater in a way that recovers most of the copper, resulting in near-zero discharge.

Through a chemical treatment method operated outside the plant premises, the recovered copper compound is purified to form copper oxide, which can be recycled and used in the PCB electrolysis process.

Trinity is working with Chung Yuan University to build a pilot plant employing this new procedure.

This new approach is an example of the innovation that is being sought by the PCB industry to produce useful, profitable and environmentally sound products.

The author is a scientist and advisor to Trinity Resource Technology Inc of Taiwan
(For more biz stories, please visit Industries
(China Daily)